Ike needed birth certificate to run for president


VOL. 16 ISSUE NO. 38   |  SEPTEMBER 22 – 28, 2010


‘Ike had nothing to hide!’

CAVE CREEK – Glen Fairclough, a reader from Salt Lake City, Utah, sent us an e-mail last week to express his gratitude for publishing the recent article regarding President Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate.

And, while going through digital images online of his hometown newspaper, the Deseret News and Telegram, Fairclough forwarded us a United Press wire article from the Oct. 2, 1952 edition he thought we would find interesting.

dwight d eisnhowerThe article appeared on page 6A with a dateline of Sherman, Texas. It was headlined: “General’s birth certificate officially filed,” and stated, “A certificate recording Dwight Eisenhower’s birth in Denison on Oct. 14, 1890, was filed Wednesday [Oct. 1, 1952] in the Grayson County Clerk’s office.

“Nobody had bothered to make out a certificate when the Republican presidential candidate was born in a house at the corner of Lamar and Day streets in nearby Denison.

“A copy of the certificate filed Wednesday was mailed to Mrs. Eisenhower in Denver. Eisenhower’s older brother, Arthur, signed the certificate. It was also signed by the Grayson County Judge J.N. Dickson and recorded by County Clerk J.C. Buchanan.”

David Dwight Eisenhower was the third of seven boys born to David Jacob and Ida Elizabeth.

Since he was called Dwight while growing up, Eisenhower swapped his first and middle names when he enrolled at West Point Military Academy.

Elected 34th president of the United States in November 1952, Eisenhower made it through his first 62 years without any need for a birth certificate.

However, the need arose when he became a presidential candidate. Since Eisenhower was the oldest man to be elected president since James Buchanan over 100 years earlier, age was obviously not at issue. Instead, there was protocol in place for presidential candidates to provide proof of eligibility to appear on the ballot.

Eisenhower, whose campaign slogan: “I like Ike” became the most famous in campaign history, won by a landslide with Richard Nixon as his running mate.

Using what the Republicans considered failures of the Truman administration, which was said to be infiltrated by Soviet spies, Eisenhower’s campaign attacked Korea, Communism and corruption.

Republicans also blamed Democrats for the military’s failure to be fully prepared to fight in Korea and pounded the Truman administration for harboring a soaring number of officials accused of crimes.

While it’s difficult not to notice history’s propensity toward repeating itself, Fairclough asserted, “Ike had nothing to hide!”


Obama, the jig is up


LTC Terry Lakin is standing up for the Constitution, his oath of service and every American who believes they both still matter

WASHINGTON – Now that every member of Congress has received a certified letter from Lucas Daniel Smith, accompanied by what he claims is a certified copy of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate procured from Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya in February 2009, as well as an offer to testify under oath, the silence from Congress on the subject is deafening.

It’s really irrelevant where Obama was born, he’s still not a “natural born” citizen and is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States, if, in fact, Obama’s father was who Obama claims.

If Obama’s father was Barack Hussein Obama, a foreign national who was only attending college on a student visa and was never a resident of the United States, Obama II, at birth, would be a dual citizen at best, and constitutionally ineligible to hold office.

Obama’s long-form birth certificate would clear that issue up in a nanosecond. It would most likely also prove his ineligibility.

However, Obama still needs to explain how he obtained a Connecticut Social Security Number (SSN) while he was attending high school in Honolulu.

That’s going to be more difficult to clear up because that same number Obama’s been using, 042-68-4425, has been associated with another individual born in 1890 who was issued the very same SSN in Connecticut circa 1976.

That same SSN is also imbedded in what we have proven to be Obama’s fraudulent Selective Service System registration, created after the fact in 2008, not in 1980, as those sloppily attempting to cover up for Obama’s past profess.

Obama didn’t register for the Selective Service in 1980, which proves another problem for the usurper in the White House. Failure to register should have forever precluded Obama from holding any position in the executive branch of the federal government.

So, when will someone – anyone – in Congress stand up and tell Obama the jig is up?
Meanwhile, with their silence, every member of Congress is allowing Lt. Col. Terry Lakin to face court martial and throw away more than 18 years of exemplary military service in his effort to protect the Constitution, which he, like every member of Congress, took an oath to uphold. Obeying illegal orders is an offense subject to prosecution just like refusing to follow legitimate orders.

Army Col. Denise R. Lind, the Army judge presiding over Lakin’s court martial, recently denied Lakin access to any of Obama’s records or testimony from those with access to those records that would prove whether or not Obama is legitimately holding office and if his orders are legal or illegal.

Lind stated the evidence could prove to be an “embarrassment” to Obama and has essentially deprived Lakin of his defense.

It’s unclear how the Army plans to proceed with Lakin’s court martial by simply asserting orders handed down through the chain of command, beginning with Obama as commander in chief, are legitimate, when all the evidence tips heavily toward Obama illegitimately holding office.

Perhaps Congress should steal a page out of the Honduran playbook on how to remove an unconstitutional president from office. While the removal was met with cheers from the citizens of Honduras, Obama called the removal of Honduran President Manuel Zelaya “illegal” and said he wanted to be very clear that Zelaya was the democratically elected president.

Visit the American Patriot Foundation’s website at http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com to learn more about Lakin’s case and to contribute to his defense.


Proof Obama was born in Kenya provided to all of Congress


VOL. 16 ISSUE NO. 36   |  SEPTEMBER 8 – 14, 2010


obama birth certificate from kenya

Smith traveled to Kenya, specifically Mombasa, with the intent to obtain a copy of the original birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama II

WASHINGTON – It’s looking more and more as though there is irrefutable evidence Barack Hussein Obama is constitutionally ineligible and that he has usurped the office of President of the United States and Commander in Chief. 

It’s been one year since Attorney Orly Taitz filed the declaration of Lucas Daniel Smith along with an exhibit purported to be Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate on behalf of Plaintiffs Captain Pamela Barnett, Alan Keyes and others in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana.

Something strange occurred between the time the declaration was filed in early September 2009 and the scheduling conference Judge David O. Carter ordered for Oct. 5, 2009.

Siddharth Vijaykumar Velamoor came on board as Carter’s new law clerk on Oct. 1, 2009.
Velamoor graduated from an obscure law school in Slovakia and in 2008 he became employed by Perkins Coie LLP in Seattle, where Robert F. Bauer, was a partner. Bauer was chair of the company’s political law group, general counsel to Obama for America, general counsel to the Democratic National Committee and represented Obama as a defendant in a number of eligibility cases.

Velamoor is also from Mercer Island where Stanley Ann Dunham was raised and attended high school.

Smith, in a Sept. 1, 2010 interview with The Post & Email, said, with funding from a private donor, he sent certified letters to every member of Congress dated July 4, 2010 containing the document he procured in Kenya.

The letter begins by referencing, “Barack Obama was born in Kenya. I personally obtained from his birth hospital and now have in my possession a certified copy of his original birth record from the British Protectorate of Kenya.”

Smith plainly states, “Barack Hussein Obama II is not a natural born citizen of the United States of America. President Obama was born in Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya at the Coast Province General Hospital in 1961,” adding, “I have proof of this.”

Smith told The Post & Email he personally entered Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya on Feb. 19, 2009 and presented a member of the hospital’s administrative staff $5,000 U.S. in cash.

He said, “I set the money down in front of them and told them the money was theirs if they could bring me a certified copy of U.S. President Barack Obama’s original hospital birth record.”

Smith stipulated he was only allowing a small window of time for the staff member to fetch the document and said the staff member returned within that specified period of time with the document.

He said he was not going to publicly disclose the specified time allotment at this time, although he said the time allotted was less than 45 minutes.

Smith stated, “The significance of the time allotment was to eliminate any possibility that the hospital staff (again seeing dollar signs) would have sufficient time to create a fake or forged document.”

Jeff Lichter, who interviewed Smith a year ago when he first came forward with the certified birth certificate from Coast Province General Hospital, said everything he told The Post & Email in the current interview is exactly what Smith told Lichter last year. He said Smith seems well-researched and appears credible.

Other dot-connecting pieces of the puzzle have recently been brought to light through Freedom of Information Act requests for Dunham’s passport and her second husband, Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro’s visa and immigration records made by Kenneth Allen of Tucson. Again, some of these bits of information raised more questions than answers.

However, one interesting bit of information revealed Dunham had Obama removed from her passport in 1965. Why, we don’t know, although several people speculate Obama obtained an Indonesian passport, as his adoption by Soteoro would have made him an Indonesian citizen.

So far, Obama’s paternal step-grandmother has stated Obama was born in Mombasa and that she was present when he was born and members of the Kenyan Parliament have openly stated Obama was born in Kenya, while no hospital in Hawaii or anywhere else in the United States will claim to be his birthplace.

However, Coast Province General Hospital has claimed Obama’s birth, stating his parents’ names, the date and time of birth, his weight and length, and includes a footprint. It is signed by the attending doctor as well as the supervisor of obstetrics.

And, now that every member of Congress has been provided with a copy of what appears to be a legitimate certified copy of Obama’s birth certificate from Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya, we can only question what they plan to do with that information.

 Copyright © 2010 Sonoran News

Still seeking an explanation for Obama’s SSN 042-68-4425



The SSA neither issues Connecticut SSNs to Hawaiian residents nor does it ‘recycle’ dead people’s SSNs

selective service screenPresident Obama’s Selective Service System registration, 61-1125539-1 was verified by entering his last name, date of birth: Aug. 4, 1961, and Social Security number 042-68-4425, a number issued in Connecticut between 1976 and 1979, which is when Obama was attending high school in Hawaii, to an individual born in 1890.

WASHINGTON – According to the Social Security Administration (SSA), the first three digits of every Social Security number (SSN) indicates the state in which the person resides. Only one number may be issued to any given person, even in the event of identity theft, and numbers are never “recycled” after a person dies.

The instructions accompanying the application to apply for an original SSN, apply for a replacement card, and change or correct information on a SSN record are riddled with the term “you must.”

The instructions begin by stating, “IMPORTANT: You MUST provide a properly completed application and the required evidence before we can process your application. We can only accept original documents or documents certified by the custodian of the original record. Notarized copies or photocopies which have not been certified by the custodian of the records are not acceptable.”

It goes on to state, “To apply for an original card, you must provide at least two documents to prove age, identity, and U.S. citizenship or current lawful, work-authorized immigration status. If you are not a U.S. citizen and do not have DHS work authorization, you must prove you have a valid non-work reason for requesting a card.”

It specifically points out, “If you are 12 or older and have never received a SSN, you must apply in person.”

In January 2005, President Bush signed Public Law 108-458, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which required the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Commissioner of Social Security and others, “to promulgate regulation establishing minimum standards for birth certificates,” which, among other things, mandated a requirement for proof and verification of identity as a condition of issuance of a birth certificate.

Public Law 108-458 limited the number of replacement SSN cards issued to any individual to three per year and 10 for the life of the individual, while establishing minimum standards for the verification of documents or records submitted by an individual to establish eligibility for an original or replacement SSN card, other than for enumeration at birth (EAB).

The Commissioner of Social Security was required to add death indicators to the SSN verification systems used by employers and state agencies issuing driver’s licenses and identity cards and allowed the commissioner discretion to add death indicators to other verification routines “as determined appropriate.”

The commissioner was also required to add fraud indicators to the SSN verification systems and make improvements to the EAB application process so as to “prevent the assignment of SSNs to unnamed children, the issuance of more than one SSN to the same child, and other opportunities for fraudulently obtaining a SSN.”

Additionally, the law prohibited federal, state and local governments from displaying SSNs on drivers’ licenses, motor vehicle registrations or other identification documents issued by state departments of motor vehicles.

SSN applicants must provide a birth certificate for evidence of age and, as proof of identity, a U.S. driver’s license, a U.S. state-issued non-driver identity card, or a U.S. passport.

The instructions state, “If you are not a U.S. citizen, we must see your current U.S. immigration document(s) and your foreign passport with biographical information or photograph.”

In all caps it emphasizes, “We cannot accept a birth certificate, hospital souvenir birth certificate, social security card stub or social security record” as evidence of identity.

For evidence of immigration status, applicants must provide a current unexpired document issued by the DHS. If an international student or exchange visitor, additional documents may be required.

It states, “If you are not authorized to work in the U.S., we can issue you a Social Security card only if you need the number for a valid non-work reason. Your card will be marked to show you cannot work and if you do work, we will notify DHS.”

Sonoran News contacted a congressional aide to ask if elected representatives, upon being elected and placed on the U.S. taxpayer-funded payroll, were required to fill out Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.

The instructions accompanying Form I-9 provide answers about the purpose of the form and when it should be used.

According to those instructions, “All employees (citizens and noncitizens) hired after November 6, 1986, and working in the United States must complete Form I-9.”

No exceptions are noted.

After contacting Member Services for the U.S. House of Representatives, the aide said she was told members are not required to fill out a Form I-9.

She was told the reason the House does not require a Form I-9 from its members is because the Constitution requires anyone who runs for a seat in the House to be a U.S. citizen for a minimum of seven years. And, when a person runs for office, they must file proof with their state’s election office that they meet the requirements of the office.

However that does not appear to be the case. If it were, Roger Calero, a Nicaraguan national and convicted felon, wouldn’t have been able to appear on the ballot as the Socialist Worker’s Party candidate for president of the United States in numerous states.
No one appears to be responsible for certifying, under penalty of perjury, that he has examined one document from List A or one each from List B and C, and that the documents presented appear genuine and relate to the candidate, who simply signs a document swearing to be eligible.

There is no apparent law or written policy that exempts members of Congress or other elected officials on taxpayer-funded payrolls from filling out a Form I-9.

Sonoran News continues to seek answers regarding Obama’s fraudulent use of another person’s SSN, the use of which has been cemented in with his fraudulently created Selective Service registration.

Copyright © 2010 Sonoran News

Obama, Sovern, trustees of Columbia University found guilty



ATLAH court issues guilty verdicts on all 17 counts of sedition, conspiracy, fraud and obstruction of justice

ATLAH, N.Y. – Last week’s article, “The People v. Columbia and Obama trial convenes in Harlem church,” detailed the bullet points of my testimony, under oath on May 15, regarding Barack Hussein Obama’s fraudulent Selective Service System registration, which also inexplicably ties him to a Connecticut Social Security Number, in the 10th Amendment trial held by Pastor James David Manning in his ATLAH World Missionary Church in Harlem.

dr james david manningOn Tuesday, May 18, the jury returned guilty verdicts against Obama, Michael Sovern, who was president of Columbia University during the period of time Obama supposedly attended, and the trustees of Columbia University, on all 17 counts of sedition, conspiracy, fraud and obstruction of justice.

Manning held a press conference on Friday, May 21, to formally announce the verdict and answer questions.

On Monday, May 24, Manning announced, “We the People spoke,” and said he was assembling a coalition to hand over the verdicts to the judiciary of the U.S. Senate, the U.S. Congress, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the U.S. Attorney General.

Manning also noted, specifically for Sovern and Columbia University, he will be submitting to the New York State Bar, New York Attorney General, New York State Regents and Atlantic Schools Accreditation a demand that their license to operate an educational institution be revoked.

“Perhaps their first response will be to defend and reject. Thereupon, will be the most exciting part of this guilty victory, inasmuch as we will proceed to court testing the constitutionality of the 10th Amendment established by our Founding Fathers,” said Manning, adding, “I expect the courts to be careful in their decision not to injure the rights of ‘We the People.’”

Attorney John Hemenway, the attorney of record in Hollister v. Obama/Soetoro, which was dismissed by U.S. District Judge James Robertson for the District of Columbia, who called the case frivolous, claiming the issue of Obama’s constitutional eligibility had been “blogged” and “twittered,” made some observations after watching the video of Manning’s press conference.

He wrote, “What a superb presentation the Rev, James Manning made during his press conference on May 21, 2010! It was a superior gathering together of the evidence that establishes without doubt that Obama-cum-Soetoro is simply a congenital liar with the Chicago gangster-type skills to maneuver his criminal propensities into successful (and illegal) capture of the White House.”

Hemenway said he “listened carefully to every word” and offered a few comments he believed “may prove useful, in the end.”

He agreed with Manning, who said he would abide with the decision of the courts, if they heard the evidence against Obama and decided on balance that they would declare Obama to be in his claimed office, legitimately and constitutionally.

“But nowhere have we found a federal judge who will accept jurisdiction over the problem and make a final determination, after discovery of evidence and a due process trial,” said Hemenway. “Interestingly, only Justice Thomas has indicated the nature of the problem when he acknowledged that no Justice on the Supreme Court wanted to take up the case. (Presumably, except Justice Thomas!)”

He also agreed with Manning’s suggestion that it is a dangerous path to recognize the practices of foreign countries and values, while ignoring the literal implementation of our Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.

Hemenway said the transcript of the Manning trial should be made available to the public, stating, “I would gladly pay for the production of a copy of the complaint and the guilty findings on the 17 counts. Anyone who is familiar with the facts does not doubt the reasonableness and fairness of the findings. Clearly, Obama-cum-Soetoro and his accomplices from Chicago gangster land have falsified documents, perjured themselves, committed wire fraud and mail fraud, and engaged in numerous racketeering activities in achieving their present position of power.”

Calling the final decision in the Manning Court “sound behind any reasonable doubt,” Hemenway acknowledged the “Obama-cum-Soetoro record is one of intense secrecy, with sealed records concealing even the most common personal records of a person in public service.”

And, like Rev. Manning, Hemenway has also heard enough about “Obama-cum-Soetoro’s lack of the Constitutional requirement necessary to qualify for the Presidency. Most citizens of America, when presented with the facts, will agree that the case has been fairly tried in public and the verdict is in.”

To make the decision effective, however, Hemenway believes the trial transcript along with the indictment and verdict should be made available to every trial attorney with a current case in the courts or with the intention to use these materials in a RICO (Racketeer-Influenced, Corrupt Organization) case, citing, “There is enough material here to occupy a hundred attorneys. Perhaps, even the not-so-neutral press corps eventually will sit up and take notice and start examining the real news.”

Meanwhile, on March 22, Dr. Orly Taitz, the Orange County dentist and attorney who represented numerous eligibility cases and is currently a candidate for California Secretary of State, filed an appeal with the Social Security Administration (SSA), demanding a hearing with regard to the SSA’s denial of requested information under the Freedom of Information Act regarding Social Security Number (SSN) 042-68-4425, “fraudulently obtained” and used by Obama.

Taitz noted in her appeal, according to affidavits provided by licensed investigators Meil Sankey and Susan Daniels, Obama has used multiple SSNs, which she says indicates Social Security fraud and identity theft.

“One does not have an expectation of privacy and right to privacy, when he uses the identity of others,” wrote Taitz, adding, “Moreover, such individual is subject to criminal prosecution for such crimes.”

In her appeal, addressed to Dawn S. Wiggins, SSA FOIA Information Officer, Taitz wrote, “If you, as a Social Security officer, upon receiving such information, are refusing to act and prosecute, you become complicit and subject to criminal liability for aiding and abetting of felonies, subornation of felonies and under RICO.”

Taits cites Obama’s Selective Service System registration confirms his use of the SSN issued in Connecticut between the years 1976-1977, while Obama was a resident of Hawaii.
Also, according to Sankey and Daniels, the Connecticut SSN was originally assigned to an individual born in 1890, who obtained the SSN late in life possibly to obtain Medicare or Medicaid benefits.

And, just like Manning and Hemenway, Taitz has been denigrated with terms such as “kook” and “birther” for bringing facts about Obama’s lack of constitutional eligibility into question. Taitz says she, her husband and three children have also been subjected to horrific intimidation, harassment and death threats, while her vehicle, PayPal account and website have all been tampered with.

shopping cart

Copyright © 2010 Sonoran News

The People v. Columbia and Obama trial convenes in Harlem church


By Linda Bentley | May 19, 2010

‘I want to make all of you aware of the forces against this house and against this trial, but I believe we will prevail’

atlah world missionary chruch in halem The trial, held at ATLAH World Missionary Church in Harlem was under tight security requiring anyone wishing to attend to be subjected to security screening, including a metal detector.

ATLAH, N.Y. – Dr. James David Manning has renamed Harlem “ATLAH,” a name “given to him by Almighty God” on Sept. 14, 1991, which means “the land where the people shall walk barefoot, because the land is holy ground.”

Manning got the world’s attention through his animated videos posted on YouTube condemning Obama, whom he refers to repeatedly as the “long-legged Mac Daddy,” which means “top pimp.”

However, Manning isn’t just calling Obama names; he’s calling Obama out as an impostor and usurper, illegally holding the office of President of the United States, in the name of the Lord, America and the Constitution. Manning is also holding Columbia University responsible for being complicit in a scheme to falsify Obama’s credentials and background and contends he can prove Obama never attended Columbia.

pastor james daivd manning With a commanding presence, Pastor James David Manning was as prepared as any attorney would be expected to be at trial in his questioning of witnesses to prove his case against Obama and the Columbia University-assisted C.I.A. cover-up.

Manning decided to hold what he calls a “10th Amendment sanctioned trial” after reviewing the briefs filed by myriad attorneys and watching as case after case was categorically denied access or due process on the matter of Obama’s eligibility to hold office, whereas no person appears to have standing to uphold Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which states, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen years a Resident within the United States.”

According to Manning, it’s not a grand jury, it’s not a hearing; it’s a trial. He said, “We are going to adjudicate this trial in such a way that it will be historically respectful and appellate-proof.”

“We have proof of Obama’s ineligibility,” declared Manning, “We have documented evidence that Barack Hussein Obama II is not a ‘natural born Citizen,’ as required by the U.S. Constitution to be President of the United States, and that Obama also did not attend Columbia University from 1981-1983 as Obama has claimed.”

Manning read with interest my March 3, 2010 article, “Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory,” and called to ask if I would testify regarding my research into Obama’s Selective Service System records, which, from all indications, appear to have been created after the fact and inexplicably link him to a Connecticut-issued Social Security Number.”

I agreed and headed to Harlem, or rather ATLAH, and testified in day two of the trial, which began on Friday, May 14 and is expected to run through Wednesday May 19.

manning marching at columbia university Dr. James David Manning, pastor of ATLAH World Missionary Church and his wife Elizabeth led the march around Columbia University each day before the trial, symbolic of Joshua leading the Israelites to tumble the walls of Jericho.

On May 15, following the morning march around Columbia University, Manning introduced Jan Johnson, a member of his congregation, who is also running for governor of the state of New York as a Constitution Party candidate, and agreed to sit in that day as a substitute judge.

Pointing out Johnson had never presided as a judge before, Manning quipped, “Neither has Elena Kagan,” Obama’s nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court.

He told attendees, “I want to make all of you aware of the forces against this house and against this trial, but I believe we will prevail.”

Manning was as prepared as an attorney with his line of questioning and the bullet points of my testimony, under oath, proceeded to lay out the following facts:

In an interview that aired on Sept. 7, 2008, Obama told George Stephanopoulos that he had to register for the draft when he graduated from high school.

Obama graduated from High School in 1979.

President Gerald Ford eliminated the draft in 1975.

There was no draft or Selective Service System registration in 1979.

President Carter didn’t reinstate Selective Service System registration until 1980.

Obama’s Selective Service System registration card is date stamped July 29, [19]80 (the year was an off-centered, two-digit number without the 19) by the Makiki Post Office in Honolulu.

judge jan johnson Jan Johnson, a member of the ATLAH World Missionary Church congregation and New York gubernatorial candidate for the Constitution Party, agreed to preside as a substitute judge during day two of the Obama eligibility trial.

None of the date stamps on 17 other registrations obtained from the Selective Service System through a FOIA request were stamped with two-digit years, including two stamped at the same Makiki station where Obama allegedly registered.

Two different Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for Obama’s selective service records were made by two different people. One request was made by retired ICE Agent J. Stephen Coffman in October 2008, while another request was made by Kenneth Allen in February 2009.

Both requests, however, were fulfilled with documents bearing computer screen dates of Sept. 9, 2008, two days after Obama’s interview with Stephanopoulos aired, but several weeks to several months prior to either Coffman or Allen’s FOIA requests.

The FOIA request I made in December 2009 (after my initial request in October went unacknowledged) for the records of 17 others who registered with the Selective Service during the same period of time as Obama was fulfilled in late January 2010 with documents bearing computer screen dates of Jan. 15 and Jan. 20. In other words, the documents bore dates between the time I requested them and the time the request was fulfilled.

The documents that Coffman and Allen received were dated prior to either’s requests and seemingly frozen on the screen date Sept. 9, 2008, although the data was different.

The computer printout sent to Coffman reflected a “Last Action Date” of Sept. 4, 1980, the date Obama’s original registration was theoretically entered into the computer.

Although the records sent to Allen also bore a computer screen date of Sept. 9, 2008, Allen’s records displayed a “Last Action Date” of June 25, 1991, indicating a Form 50 Letter for a change of address was entered on that date.

The DLN (Document Locator Number) on the computer printout provided to Coffman added an eight to the beginning of the number stamped on his registration form, whereas the computer printout sent to Allen added a zero to the end. DLNs do not change once issued.

Obama’s selective service registration is on file with Social Security Number 042-68-4425, a series issued in Connecticut between 1976 and 1977 and while Obama was attending high school in Hawaii.

Entering Obama’s last name, the Connecticut-issued SSN and birth date of Aug. 4, 1961, I pulled up Obama’s Selective Service Number: 61-1125539-1, which inexplicably links Obama to the Connecticut-issued Social Security Number, which two private investigators have attested to being issued sometime between 1976 and 1977 to another person in Connecticut that was born in 1890.

One cannot obtain a Social Security Number for any state of their choosing – one must reside in that state, provide proof of citizenship, legal residency or work authorization in order to obtain a Social Security Number. There is no documented evidence Obama has ever lived in Connecticut and certainly not while attending high school in Hawaii.

jurorsTwelve jurors and two alternates were seated on Saturday. They listened intensely to witness’ testimony and took copious notes during the People v. Obama and Columbia University trial conducted by Pastor James David Manning.

Two days after providing my testimony and prior to e-mailing the link to the Selective Service System search engine, just to make sure the link was still valid, so others could verify for themselves Obama’s use of the Connecticut-issued SSN, I entered Obama’s name, SSN and birth date into the Selective Service System search engine on May 17.
I received the following message:

“Sorry, your request cannot be processed at this time because you have exceeded the daily limit for the verification of these credentials.
“(5/17/2010 10:43:20 AM)”

For the record, I’ve not made any inquiries into the Selective Service System database since performing my research in October 2009. I also have a printout, dated Oct. 11, 2009, of the “Matched Record” for Obama with Selective Service Number 61-1125539-1, indicating a “Date of Registration” of Sept. 4, 1980, the date when the batch of registration forms, supposedly including Obama’s, were entered into the system.

However, immediately after receiving that error message, I made another inquiry for another individual born on Oct. 30, 1971 and whose SSN is one digit different from Obama’s, and was able to retrieve a “Matched Record” with Selective Service Number: 71-1390464-8 and a registration date of Jan. 30, 1990.

The Selective Service System has done a sloppy job of creating Obama’s after-the-fact records, which inexplicably tie him to a Connecticut SSN, and by sending substantially different records to different requesters.

However, beyond not being natural born Citizen, as required by the Constitution, if one does not register with the Selective Service System before his 26th birthday, one is forever precluded from holding a job with the U.S. Post Office or with the executive branch of the federal government.

And, about that two-digit year on the round date stamp supposedly stamped on Obama’s registration form at the Makiki Post Office in Honolulu, the year is a single piece and always contains four digits, as confirmed this morning at the local post office.

cody robert judy Cody Robert Judy’s testimony wrapped up day two of Dr. James David Manning’s trial of the People v. Obama and Columbia University. Judy, who ran for president in 2008 as a Conservative Party candidate, filed a complaint against John McCain and the RNC, alleging McCain, who was born in Panama, was constitutionally ineligible to be president.

And, following my testimony on Saturday,
Jeff Jones, a member of Manning’s congregation and 24-year post office employee, took to the stand and testified to the same.

Manning provided video documentation of the Certification of Live Birth displayed online by FactCheck as “proof” of Obama’s eligibility and the host of articles ridiculing “Birthers” in the mainstream media.

He then called Cody Robert Judy to the stand.

Judy ran for president in 2008 as a Conservative Party candidate. He also filed a lawsuit against John McCain and the RNC, contending McCain was constitutionally ineligible to be president, as he was born in Panama.

Judy testified it wasn’t until eleven months after McCain was born that legislation was passed making children born to American Citizens in Panama, American citizens.

At the time, Judy said he wasn’t really cognizant of Obama’s lack of eligibility, since he was busy “cleaning up my own house.”

However, according to Judy, the judge failed to timely rule in his case, waiting until after McCain lost the election, and then dismissed the case as moot.

Judy also testified there was a legislative attempt to eliminate the natural born citizenship requirement back in 2000 when McCain first ran for president.

Although the natural born citizen clause has yet to be challenged in court, Obama sponsored a non-binding resolution declaring McCain a natural born citizen, and Judy believes not a single Republican objected to Obama’s candidacy because Obama sponsored a bill declaring McCain eligible. In other words, he said, the Republicans looked the other way because they “got their candidate.”

Photos by Linda Bentley

shopping cart

Copyright © 2010 Sonoran News

DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office


The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president
DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office

By JB Williams Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Barack Obama

Members from all three branches of the Federal government already know that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible for the office of President. National leaders, to include members of the US Supreme Court, already know that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, and therefore, is ineligible for the office he currently holds. (See JB’s new article on The Bottom Line on Natural Born Citizen)

What they don’t know is how long it will take for most Americans to figure it out, or what to do about it.

The diversionary search for an authentic birth certificate is ongoing and Obama has now spent in excess of $2 million in legal fees to keep that search alive.

Eric Holder’s Department of Justice continues to deploy taxpayer funded attorneys around the country to file dismissals on behalf of Obama, denying all American citizens access to the courts as a peaceful remedy, which only fuels the fire of discontent and the questions about Obama persist.

Michelle Obama states that Kenya is Barack’s “home country.” She knows, after twenty years with Barack. The Ambassador or Kenya has confirmed the same His family friends all know it, and are in fact quite proud of the fact that Americans had no hesitation in electing a “black man from Kenya” as President of the United States.

The US Supreme Court knows what the constitutional condition of “natural born citizen” means. Even the most far left member of that court, Justice Ginsberg, is on record proclaiming that a “natural born citizen” is a birth child of TWO legal US citizens.

Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible for the office of president, which is why she refused to certify the following language when certifying Obama as the DNC candidate for president in 2008.

This is the normal language for certification of nomination for president and vice president, filed by the DNC only in the state of Hawaii…

This is the language filed by the DNC in the other 49 states, however…

Note that the language which certifies that Barack Hussein Obama meets all constitutional qualifications is missing in the DNC documents filed in 49 of the 50 states. The certification of constitutional qualification for the office of president was filed only in Hawaii. That text is missing in the DNC certification filings for all other states.

Whereas the RNC filed the exact same certification document, including the constitutional text for John McCain in all 50 states, Obama was technically certified in only one state, Hawaii. A mere inconvenient technicality, I’m sure…

The US Congress knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not constitutionally qualified for the office he holds. Although the congress passed a resolution proclaiming Senator John McCain a “natural born citizen” as the son of two US citizens, no such congressional resolution exists for Barack Hussein Obama.

The press knows that Obama is not a “natural born citizen,” having written on several occasions about the “Kenyan born” senator from Chicago. A number of citizens have already been arrested and jailed for asking these questions.

Over four-hundred law suits have been filed across the country asking the courts to force Obama to become the “transparent president” he promised to be, and all four-hundred are being dismissed before discovery, all on the basis that “no citizen has proper legal standing” to ask who and what their president really is…

Over a half-million citizens have now signed a petition demanding to see Obama’s birth records.

Numerous members of the US Military have refused deployment orders from Obama, on the basis that he refuses to evidence his constitutional qualifications to issue such orders. In most cases, the soldiers have simply been reassigned, so as to avoid any disciplinary action that could end in “defense discovery” which might finally force Obama to open up his files once and for all.

Now an eighteen year veteran flight surgeon and active Lt. Colonel faces court martial as he makes his demands for proof that Obama is constitutionally eligible to issue orders as Commander-in-Chief.

Obama’s entire domestic, foreign and national defense agenda has proven to be wholly anti-American
Obama’s entire domestic, foreign and national defense agenda has proven to be wholly anti-American on every possible level. Still, the answers concerning who and what Barack Hussein Obama Jr. really is remain elusive in the face of unprecedented efforts to ask the right questions.

No matter who asks, how they ask or where they ask, not one single individual in Washington DC or even state government seems willing to weigh in on the most important issue of our era. Who and what is the man sitting in the people’s White House?

How in the hell did we get an overtly anti-American resident of the people’s White House without so much as a simple birth certificate to prove who this person really is?

And why won’t a single elected representative of the people engage in the effort to force an answer to this question?

The answers to these and many more questions are likely very simple and equally chilling…

The Speaker of the House does not refuse to certify her candidate as “constitutionally qualified” in forty-nine of fifty states by accident
Nobody spends $2 million in legal fees to hide an authentic birth certificate. The Speaker of the House does not refuse to certify her candidate as “constitutionally qualified” in forty-nine of fifty states by accident. A press that knew he was the “first Kenyan born senator” didn’t forget that he was Kenyan born when he decided to run for president.

Most importantly, the people DO have a right (read – proper standing) to ask who and what their president really is, in any court, any time. And soldiers are court-martialed for refusing orders, unless those orders were issued by an illegitimate Commander-in-Chief.

DC knows what most Americans have yet to figure out…

Obama is NOT a natural born citizen no matter where he might have been born. Obama’s birth father was at no time an American citizen and on this basis alone, Obama cannot be a constitutionally qualified resident of the White House.

They know something else that the American people have yet to figure out…

The US Constitution no longer stands as the governing law of this land. Obama’s many unconstitutional policies, Czars, executive orders and statements provide the proof, and the fact that nobody in DC cares whether or not Obama is constitutionally qualified to be president of the United States should send a shiver down the spine of every red blooded American citizen, no matter their partisan agendas.

The people willing to ask the tough questions are deemed crackpots and conspiracy theorists, racists or bigots. But those tough questions should be obvious questions to all Americans and every president should have to answer those questions, no matter race, creed, color or party affiliation.

I fear that those questions will only be answered at the tip of pitch forks and torches one day. Sooner or later, the people will run out of patience with a system built to exclude them. When that day comes, I fear what methods will be employed and whether or not there will be a country left to save by then.

But sooner or later, one way or another, Obama will have to answer those questions. One day, the world will know who and what this man is and there will be a day of reckoning like no other in American history.

The longer it takes for that day to arrive, the more dangerous the situation will become. A man not even qualified to hold the office is using that office to destroy the greatest nation on earth. How much patience can the people be expected to display?

Obama is not eligible for the office he currently holds and everyone in a position to know – already know.

What they don’t know is how much longer they can keep it all a secret, or what will happen next.

Army doctor faces court-martial for refusing orders pending proof of Obama’s eligibility

By Linda Bentley | April 14, 2010

| More

WASHINGTON – LTC Terrance “Terry” Lakin, the highly decorated chief of primary care and flight surgeon for the Pentagon’s DiLorenzo TRICARE Health Clinic, and lead flight surgeon charged with caring for Army Chief of Staff General Casey’s pilots and air crew, risked arrest and court-martial by refusing a direct order from his medical brigade commander for deployment to Afghanistan.

On April 8, Lakin’s explanation was posted on AmericanThinker.com, which describes itself as “a daily internet publication devoted to the thoughtful exploration of issues of importance to Americans.”

Lakin stated, “Last week, I entered Walter Reed Army Hospital to notify the Department of Defense (DoD) that I would refuse to obey any orders from my commanding officers – including President Obama – until the president produces his original birth certificate. After nearly 18 years of wearing the military uniform of the country I have proudly served.”

Military officers take an oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Lakin stated, “Upholding the law is an essential part of our role as citizens; in the military, we are the ultimate protectors of that law. The Constitution is our social compact, which safeguards all of us and ensures the ‘equal rights’ that we are entitled to as American citizens.”

In a video recording posted on SafeguardOurConstitution.org, Lakin stated he feels he has “no choice but the distasteful one of inviting my own court-martial.”

Lakin says his deployment orders for a second tour of Afghanistan included a requirement to bring copies of his birth certificate.

However, since the fall of 2008, Lakin says he’s been troubled by reports that the president’s original birth certificate, along with other documents, that would “quickly end questions surrounding his place of birth and ‘natural born’ status,” remain concealed from public view.

For over a year, Lakin has attempted through his chain of command to obtain answers to questions surrounding the president’s eligibility, only to be told he has no standing to make such an inquiry, while no one at the DoD could answer the question.

Lakin concluded the burden of proof rests with the White House and with Obama himself, stating “… these records are his, and he has chosen to conceal them at considerable legal expense.”

Lakin found it remarkable that there is no enforcement mechanism in place for the Constitution’s Article II, Section I requirement that the president be a “natural born citizen,” leaving voters to rely on “an honor system and a free press to vet candidates …”

In a March 30, 2010 letter to Obama, Lakin wrote, “Please assure the American people that you are indeed constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander in Chief and thereby may lawfully direct service members into harm’s way. I will be proud to deploy to Afghanistan to further serve my country and fellow soldiers, but I shall only do so with the knowledge that this important provision of our Constitution is respected and obeyed.

“Unless this is established (by this sufficient proof that should be easily within your power to provide) that you are constitutionally eligible to serve as President and my Commander in Chief, I, and all other military officers may be following illegal orders. Therefore, sir, until an original birth certificate is brought forward that validates your eligibility and puts to rest the other reasonable questions surrounding your unproven eligibility, I cannot in good conscience obey ANY military orders.”

Lakin said, “There is no legitimate privacy right to information necessary to prove that President Obama is legally eligible to serve as Commander in Chief.”

On March 31, the Army issued an “event-oriented” developmental counseling report regarding Lakin’s intentions to refuse to follow deployment orders.

Under “Key Points of Discussion,” The Army counselor wrote, “This counseling is to inform you that your deployment orders are presumed to be valid and lawful orders issued by competent military authority … Failure to follow your reassignment and/or deployment orders may result in adverse action including court martial.”

He also stated if Lakin is found guilty at court-martial, he could be “sentenced to dismissal from the service, which is akin to a dishonorable discharge; forfeiture of all pay and allowances; and confinement for a period of months or years in military prison.”

In conclusion, he encouraged Lakin to “seek advice from an attorney with the U.S. Army Trial Defense Service before embarking on a course of conduct which you may quickly regret.”

The American Patriot Foundation (APF), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit national foundation founded in 2003 for the primary purpose of educating and advocating the importance of patriotism, is seeking tax-deductible donations for Lakin’s legal defense fund.

Few military officers appear willing to risk their careers to uphold their oaths and the few that do have been labeled “Birthers.”

However, on page 31 of the March 25 Hansard (transcript) of the Kenyan parliamentary session, during debate over a draft constitution, Lands Minister James Orengo stated, “Those who fear devolution are living in the past. They are being guided by their ethnic consideration and objectives … If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion …”

That would answer why Obama has spent upwards of $1.7 million to prevent his records from being released and the truth revealed.

On April 12, Lakin met with Col. Gordon R. Roberts, his brigade commander, who read Lakin his Miranda rights because he would soon be charged with serious crimes, specifically, missing movement and conduct unbecoming an officer.

Lakin’s Pentagon Access Pass has since been revoked and his laptop computer was seized.
Due to the seriousness of the impending charges against Lakin, APF renewed its plea for donations to his legal defense fund. Details are available at www.SafeguardOurConstitution.org.

Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory



 Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory

A man who fails to register with SS before turning 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed

By Linda Bentley | March 3, 2010

ARLINGTON, Va. – On Sept. 7, 2008, Barack Hussein Obama appeared on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” and stated, “I had to sign up for Selective Service (SS) when I graduated from high school … And I actually always thought of the military as an ennobling and, you know, honorable option. But keep in mind that I graduated in 1979. The Vietnam War had come to an end. We weren’t engaged in active military conflict at that point. And so, it’s not an option that I ever decided to pursue.”

Some people did keep in mind that he graduated in 1979 and noted the registration requirement was suspended in April 1975 by President Gerald Ford and wasn’t reinstituted until 1980 by President Jimmy Carter in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
The Military Selective Service Act required men born in the calendar year 1961 to register on any of the six days beginning Monday, July 28, 1980.

On Oct. 13, 2008, J. Stephen Coffman, a retired federal agent, filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the SS for a copy of Obama’s SS registration form.
His FOIA request was processed on Oct. 29, 2008, two days after the SS claimed it was received.

Coffman received a copy of Obama’s registration form along with a copy of the computer inquiry screen, which showed an access date of Sept. 9, 2008, several weeks prior to Coffman’s request.

It was accompanied by a letter from Richard S. Flahavan, associate director for public affairs and intergovernmental affairs, who stated, “Also, the enclosed computer inquiry screen indicates that his registration number is 61-1125539-1, as previously provided to you.”

The computer printout shows a transaction date of Sept. 4, 1980 (the date Obama’s July 29, 1980 registration was entered into the system) with a last action date of Sept. 4, 1980, signifying nothing else had been received or entered since the original Sept. 4, 1980 registration form.

Coffman found it peculiar his request, according to the computer printout date, was processed on Sept. 9, 2008, several weeks prior to submitting his request.

On Feb. 9, 2009, Kenneth Allen submitted a FOIA request for the same records. He received a response, also from Flavahan, dated March 4, 2009.

Flavahan said a copy of Obama’s SS registration was enclosed along with “the resultant automated file screen,” adding, “Mr. Obama did indeed register with the Selective Service and was assigned Selective Service Number 61-1125539-1 on Sept. 4, 1980.”

The 10-digit Document Locator Number (DLN) 0897080632 is printed or stamped across the top right hand corner of the registration form.

The computer printout provided to Coffman displayed an 11-digit DLN of 8089 708 0632.
The computer printouts provided to both Allen and Coffman are both dated Sept. 9, 2008.
The copy of the registration form provided to Allen and Coffman are identical.

However, Allen’s computer printout is titled “Registrant File Inquiry Report” while Coffman’s is titled “RIMS History Inquiry Screen.”

And, the DLN on the computer printout received by Allen, also an 11-digit number, reads: 0897 080 6320.

So, while Coffman’s printout had an eight added to the beginning, Allen’s had a zero added to the end.

Once issued, DLNs do not change.

Even though the inquiry screen indicates Allen’s request was processed on Sept. 9, 2008, just like Coffman’s, it reflects a last action date of June 25, 1991, showing a Form 50 change letter had been received and entered then. Records provided to Coffman reflected no such action.

The post office round date stamp on Obama’s registration form also raised legitimacy concerns. The stamp displays “USPO Honolulu, HI Makiki Sta.” with “Jul 29 80” stamped in the center of the circle on three lines. However, the two-digit year is stamped off center as if it should have been a four-digit date.

Last week Sonoran News received a response to a FOIA request for 17 SS records for the purpose of making comparisons. 

Every single one of them has a four-digit year stamp, including two registrations processed at the very same post office, one within days of Obama’s.

In fact, Bruce Henderson, now deceased, whose birthday was also in August 1961, registered on Aug. 2, 1980 at the Makiki station and his SS number is 61-1125522-7, just 27 numbers apart from Obama’s.

The 10-digit DLN on his registration form reads: 0897080613 and the 11-digit DLN on the computer printout reads: 0897 080 6130, indicating a zero had been added to the end.

Henderson’s registration was also entered in the same batch as Obama’s on Sept. 4, 1980.
Our FOIA request was initially made in October 2009, but after receiving neither a response nor an acknowledgement, a subsequent request was made in December 2009 via certified mail, the receipt of which was promptly acknowledged.

The request was fulfilled by Paula Sweeney from the office of public and intergovernmental affairs and the computer printouts are dated Jan. 15, 2010 and Jan. 20, 2010.

Every single one of the registrations processed in 1980 had a zero added to the end of the DLN on the computer printout, a practice that appears to have changed subsequent to that time.

In fact, a registration dated March 1, 1982 with a 10-digit DLN of 2120360884 stamped on the registration form, has an 11-digit DLN of 8212 036 0884 entered in the computer, which appears to be consistent with registrations added after 1980, and possibly not until 1982.

It became obvious records were created after the fact for Obama and were later changed. However, the computer access date is frozen on Sept. 9, 2008; two days after Obama appeared on Stephanopoulos’ show saying he registered with SS in 1979 when the requirement was nonexistent.

The mistakes made by adding to and changing the fraudulently created record after Coffman’s FOIA request was fulfilled but before the Allen’s was received, provides an audit trail of the fraud.

It would appear Flahavan, who processed both requests, should have caught the glaring incongruities. Instead, he got cocky in his letter to Allen by proclaiming, “Mr. Obama did indeed register with Selective Service …”

The SS website proclaims, “Registration is the law. A man who fails to register may, if prosecuted and convicted, face a fine of up to $250,000 and/or a prison term of up to five years.”

It goes on to say, “Even if not tried, a man who fails to register with Selective Service before turning age 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed,” including federal student loans or grant programs.

A man must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the executive branch of the federal government, which includes president of the United States.

Registration is also a condition for U.S. citizenship if the man first arrived in the United States before his 26th birthday.

If Obama arrived in Hawaii as a citizen of Indonesia, as his school records and mother’s divorce records indicate, and he didn’t register with SS, he could have been barred from obtaining U.S. citizenship and may not be one now.

However, those covering up Obama’s tracks have done a sloppy job, which means there really is a conspiracy to defraud the American people, not just a theory.

Dr. James David Manning speaks truth to power: Obama

Must see video of Dr. Manning talking about the CIA visiting his Church this week and here what he has to say to Barack Hussein Long Legged Mack Daddy Obama about it.

Hon. James David Manning, PhD thanks Barack Obama for the Homeland Security Secret Service Officials visit.